330. Democrracy or autocracy, what is better?

Let me start by nailing my colours to the mast. Democracy, all the way. The only system that can empower all citizens, protect minorities, enshrine civil liberties and avoid abuse of power. However, it has its problems. It is functional when leaders and parties place the interest of the citizenship above their own, govern for all and not just for their side. Otherwise, it swings wildly in cycles of power which are used by each faction to undo the progress made by the previous incumbents, fighting oppositions which oppose for opposition’s sake. The ideal for democracy to progress is for moderate groups to alternate power, keeping a somewhat general direction of travel, moderated towards their political leaning but built on their predecessors’ achievements. With today’s polarisation, this is not what we are seeing in UK, US, Spain and other countries and, when we do not, democracy becomes ineffective, gridlocked, and autocracies shine in comparison by their ability to get things done

Length: 996 characters

Comments

Ana said…
Totally agree. Nowadays democracy is a perversion. General misinformation and the widespread drop off in education success play also in this direction
Ana said…
Needless to say, still our best option...

Popular posts from this blog

98. Choosing the best sources

283. The trouble with journalists these days

251. The privacy debate